Thanks. That seems logical but I was thinking that updating might be preferred because UI-wise the shortest route to get back to a thread seems to be through Nodes You Wrote, where the update form is prominent and inviting. Also I frequently see Update: sections in the nodes of others.
From that and other context clues I guessed there might be an argument in favor of having fewer but more complete/concise/accurate nodes, and being new, I don't want to assert my way of doing things over what might be considered proper forum etiquette. The [id://PerlMonks FAQ] is clear on most things but I didn't see this sort of thing addressed there.
Actually, on the whole, the FAQ seems to encourage sensible use of the update form. It doesn't really contradict an assertion of “use the power of threads”, but neither does it actually say this that I could see.
In reply to Re^2: Preferred procedures for updating PM nodes
by madizen
in thread Preferred procedures for updating PM nodes
by madizen
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |