I'm writing code to test Windows dialog resources for compliance with various in-house rules for layout etc. Among the rules are constraints on how controls are layed out WRT each other - spacing and such.

My question is, is there a tidy way of quickly checking for rectangle overlap (I can inflate control rectangles to accomodate the margins they need to have). A simplification may be that the rectangles are constrained to an integer grid (dialog units) where the integers are of modest size (less than 800 x 600) limited by maximum dialog sizes.

So are there any modules around that I can leverage for this task. If not, is it something that would be worth writing a CPAN module for?


DWIM is Perl's answer to Gödel

In reply to Detecting control placement constraints in dialog resources - rectangle overlap checking by GrandFather

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.