The OO stuff is what I precisely was referring to when I said Perl 6 will just make things a whole lot easier to build by providing default mechanisms that would have to be built manually Perl 5. Class::C3, Class::Trait, NEXT: all built in or easy to achieve, and more powerful and flexible. But you do have all of those in Perl 5 in some form – it just takes way more effort, which most people are unwilling to expend (hardly surprising).
Really, if you think the Perl 6 we have now should have been called something other than Perl 6, then what kind of language should have been called Perl 6?
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re^5: perl6 or not perl6 ...
by Aristotle
in thread perl6 or not perl6 ...
by monkey_boy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |