I just recently brought a long-running process down from 2+ hours per invocation to just over five minutes per, using aggressive caching (and lots of RAM!) but I would have guessed wrong had I not profiled first. It turned out that the chunk I thought would be the biggest CPU hog was actually number six on the list, and not worth fooling with.
In reply to Re^2: To cache or not to cache
by gloryhack
in thread To cache or not to cache
by blogical
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |