So my logic above is flawed. I'm almost certain that I tested your pattern earlier and it failed - but obviously not.
Anyway, I guess that means that the regex engine is "smart enough" to know that even if it gets a match with the [012345]? - it has to "release" it to the \d if there is no 2nd digit - yes?
In reply to Re^4: simple pattern match ?
by McDarren
in thread simple pattern match ?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |