So to follow your logic, we can't even define a set properly, at least not completely.

By my logic we can't define that particuar set, because it doesn't exist.

Next is the hard part. Define R as the set of all sets not in S.

Is there any reason to assume that R will exist simply because S exists? Is there an axiom in set theory to the effect that "Every set must have a complement"? I'm not being glib or rhetorical in those two questions, and those questions are really the meat of the issue. There has to be a reason why R should exist for Russel's Paradox to truly be a paradox. I didn't notice the reason in the linked articles, and I'm curious.

Can something be both in the set and not in the set?

No it can't, and that's the proof that R doesn't exist.

So to follow your logic, we can't even define a set properly, at least not completely. We can only say what is in certain kinds of sets, and not what isn't in them.

This comes back to assuming that R should exist. There isn’t a problem with being unable to define non-existent sets. Heck, I don't define non-existent sets in my sleep! If there is a reason that R should exist, then we’ve got a problem.

In reply to Re^4: BlooP and FlooP and GlooP: Turing Equivalence, Lazy Evaluation, and Perl6 by Anonymous Monk
in thread BlooP and FlooP and GlooP: Turing Equivalence, Lazy Evaluation, and Perl6 by jonadab

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.