It's a very good question, as it deals more with the philosophy of programming, and isn't a specific "why isn't such-and-such working?" the way the usual questions are.
In the absence of more information, I like CountZero's answer, because it's clean and simple. But xdg's answer is a good one too, especially if there are cases where you might other subroutines (eg. gamma, delta, etc.) to call the new _internal_sub() subroutine.
I did want to point out that, when I encounter a situation like this, it often helps me to ask whether the two subroutines would be likely to evolve together? That is, if you were to make a change/improvement to alpha(), would you be making the same change/improvement to beta()? If so, then by all means use a flag (eg. set to "alpha" or "beta") so that you get more mileage from only having to make future changes to one subroutine rather than two.
s''(q.S:$/9=(T1';s;(..)(..);$..=substr+crypt($1,$2),2,3;eg;print$..$/
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.