It took me a while to figure out what you had in mind. It seems that you want to get a preorder tree traversal without actually building a tree. Which doesnt sound that great a plan.
Why do you want to avoid a recursive routine?
In reply to Re: Adjancey Tree Confusion
by demerphq
in thread Adjacency Tree Confusion
by ChrisR
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |