It may be that there is a monk that recognises your problem domain and therefore understands what your pseudo code and cryptic abreviations mean and can help you. However, if you want a larger number of eyes to look at your problem without glazing I'd seriously consider writing a short test script that demonstrates your problem without obfusicating abreviations and unrunable code. It may help to read I know what I mean. Why don't you?.
In reply to Re: updating hash from perl -> xsub
by GrandFather
in thread updating hash from perl -> xsub
by mrobinton
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |