Either because there is no need for categorisation any more or because the way it is done is too difficult for new(?) module authors. It might have been too much work for the few volunteers or is just not well known to most of the new authors. Besides, there are only < 30 categories. That was good 10 years ago, but not any more, I think.
When I find a module doing X, I would like to have a link to the other related modules so I can easily compare them.
In reply to Re^2: Module categorization
by szabgab
in thread Module categorization
by szabgab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |