Interesting counter-point. It sounds like a difference either in how we read code or in how we prefer to optimize our code for readability.

Yup. Although, personally, I think that use with an explicitly empty import list is a clear winner on the readability front because of its lack of ambiguity.

I would tend to write as I described above to stand out better -- or perhaps write "use Module qw()" for a similarly distinctive effect.

We'll just have to agree to differ I guess. I don't really see any difference in readability between using qw() or not - although I can see an argument for using qw() to make adding/removing items from the import list easier.

In reply to Re^5: how NOT to import exported subs/variables from a module? by adrianh
in thread how NOT to import exported subs/variables from a module? by jfroebe

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.