I think you're looking at this from the wrong angle
I agree completely. Languages don't succeed because they have more features. They succeed because they're better at doing certain things (even if some of those things happen to be "sounding safe to management" :-)
There is no single language that has more features than all of the others.
Hmmmm... Personally I'd feel fairly happy saying, for example, that Lisp and Perl had more features than Java and C - in the sense that they support more styles of development in the core language.
In reply to Re^2: wondering the development of perl
by adrianh
in thread wondering the development of perl
by jesuashok
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |