Sounds like the kind of thing you've done with "translating" into a "generally useful" feature.
Yes, that's it exactly.
And yes, if it's too hacky, by all means decline the gig. Or better still, make recommendations for a correct implementation that you'd be willing to do, instead. Be sure to include arguments as to the greater maintainability and less of a headache for them if they decide to spend a bit more and do it the right way. Most companies will agree if the difference isn't excessive. As for those who don't, who needs them?
—Theory
In reply to Re^3: (OT) Sponsoring open source
by Theory
in thread (OT) Sponsoring open source
by creamygoodness
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |