To me, the DBIx:: modules are more useful as facade interfaces to DBI, and the class::dbi modules are helpful to define relations between tablesDBIx::Class does that too -- it's basically (y, i know i'm generalizing) a fork/provides same (type of at least; does differ in some) functionality as CDBI (note that the docs say that the "object API is inspired by Class::DBI")
In reply to Re^2: Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class
by davidrw
in thread Class::DBI vs. DBIx::Class
by hrr
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |