I think someone should look what the operator is called in the English original of K&R, and we should probably stick to that term. (If it's always referred to as something like, say, "conditional operator" then we're out of luck.)
In reply to Re: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )
by ambrus
in thread Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )
by davido
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |