Let me explain what I mean by "insecure".

Never needing to look outside our own box to find a solution sounds like a good thing (and it is), but after years of not having to look elsewhere for solutions, I found myself questioning whether I was missing out!

It is so rare that I come across a coding problem that requires more than 2 minutes searching CPAN before I discover a solution (or several!).

Rare. Maybe too rare. So rare in fact that I feel insulated from the rest of the coding world. I have never come across a problem I could not solve with Perl.

The added bonus of direct access to the source code of CPAN modules has given me an accelerated learning path (compared with Java or .NET) - further perpetuating the cycle of Perl-only knowledge. Or is it?

I happen to work at a 50/50 Microsoft/OSS shop where everything *we* write is written in VB, and anything *I* write is in Perl. At one point we were going to convert everything to Perl, but nobody else bothered learning Perl. To make a long story short, we're doing .NET now.

Having spent the last few weeks porting some VBScript code to C#, it's not much different than when I ported something similar from VBScript to Perl. It could be that it was me doing the porting both times, and that both Perl and C# have a C-style syntax.

In the past I have experimented with C++. Even though it is considered a "real" programming language, I couldn't see how anyone got anything *done* in it - so much that I took for granted with Perl simply was not available to me.

Learning C# was very different. Even though it has static typing and "One Way To Do It", its garbage collection and the .Net framework class library (analogous to a proprietary CPAN) means I can be more productive than I would be with C++, since most of the wheels I need have already been built and are part of the standard install. (Nice run-on sentence!).

I look forward to Perl6 with its vast CPAN library, built-in object system, threading and delegation. The "insulation" factor will probably still be there, but since Parrot will promote interoperability, the insulation may be more transparent.

In reply to Re^2: The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex by jdrago_999
in thread The Perl Hacker Inferiority Complex by Anonymous Monk

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.