I've noticed a recent trend of folks expressing some frustration with the abundance of choices in terms of CPAN modules, and wishing for a way to separate the wheat from the chaff (or perhaps my metaphor would better be, 'separate the wheat from the quinoa'):

... and I'm sure there are lots more. Let's face it -- most of us are busy people and can not spare a lot of time browsing through CPAN. Heck, I'm feeling guilty about taking the time to write this node. While I am quite gleeful about the fact that CPAN nearly always has a module that helps me do what I need, it is an unavoidable truth that I don't have the time or memory to really stay up-to-date on the 'best' solutions.

Without wanting to start a flame war or hurt anyone's feelings, it seems evident that for some tasks, some modules are 'better' than others, depending on how you define 'better'. Here are a few possible criteria:

Not wanting to duplicate the Phalanx Project, I wonder if we at PerlMonks could come up with a reasonably compact and dynamic list of the 'best' modules available? Perhaps a section of the site could be dedicated to 'most popular modules', where monks could propose an addition to a limited list, and could vote on the usefulness of the modules for a particular task. Or something like Saints in our Book such that a module only makes it onto the list when it achieves a certain minimum popularity. Alternatively, I envision something like the Q&A section, but in each subcategory, there is a list of modules (ranked by popularity) that might apply in that context.

Of course, there is a measure of kwalitee already in place, but it doesn't seem widely known or used (or perhaps I expose my ignorance).

I think there are many monks who might be willing to rank modules with a simple vote, who don't really have the time or willingness to write a module review (although you could argue that if a module hasn't attracted a review, it might not be one of the 'best'). We only have about 150 module reviews, though, and there is no visible ranking (apart from node popularity if you spend a vote yourself to see).

What do you think? What are the 'best' modules from your perspective? I'll start with a list of those that I personally use and like best (in no particular order), fully expecting others to disagree:

Other obvious modules I have missed?


No good deed goes unpunished. -- (attributed to) Oscar Wilde

Editted by demerphq to fix rendering of table on picky browsers

In reply to Section proposal: Best CPAN Modules by ptum

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.