You missed Digest::SHA. If the modules are otherwise equal, you should probably use Digest::SHA since people will be able to use the slower Digest::SHA::PurePerl as a drop-in replacement if they have problems installing Digest::SHA. Also, Digest::SHA's functional interface provides simple and easy access to common tasks.
By the way, while the [cpan://] is useful for searching, [mod://] is much better when linking to a specific module. e.g. [cpan://Digest::SHA] vs [mod://Digest::SHA]
In reply to Re: Would Like Recommendation for an SHA256 module
by ikegami
in thread Would Like Recommendation for an SHA256 module
by TheEnigma
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |