Yeah, just go ahead and cut corners. I mean it's just like nobody would ever need more than two digits to represent a year . . .
If it was existing code, sure it's not worth ripping out everything to change. However given that it's new code, go ahead and start correctly. Use Digest and you won't even need more than a configuration change in 17 months when SPECTRE breaks SHA-256 with the quantum computer they stole from the NSA and you have to go to SHA-1024.
In reply to Re^2: Would Like Recommendation for an SHA256 module
by Fletch
in thread Would Like Recommendation for an SHA256 module
by TheEnigma
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |