Probably you misread because I used a double negative where it was less than clear. Sorry about that.
In reply to Re^5: Let shortcut types have useful behavior in the parameterless case
by demerphq
in thread Let shortcut types have useful behavior in the parameterless case
by jdporter
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |