Almost every place where the sources attempt to "compensate" for Win32's non-*nix nature and behaviour, I find myself forced to find intricate work arounds to bypass those attempts, in order to use the facilities the OS provides.
Note that your response is to a straw man which doesn't apply to my proposal to fix system(@list) on Win32. And if somehow my proposed fix caused behavior that was not desired by you in some situation, then the "intricate work-around" to get the old behavior is system("@list"). Terribly difficult. :)
- tye
In reply to Re^10: Poll: Is your $^X an absolute path? (system $list)
by tye
in thread Poll: Is your $^X an absolute path?
by xdg
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |