I pointed out that this was not the case with the OP's code.
Actually, you pointed out that this was not the case with -l. There was no mention of the OP using -l, and I hadn't noticed 'til now. That changes everything.
In reply to Re^9: list reversal closure
by ikegami
in thread list reversal closure
by apotheon
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |