I tend to agree with you. Still, we do provide guidelines for consideration, as you point out. I guess what I thought worthy of discussion is whether the community at large considers posts such as the example that prompted the top node to fall within those guidelines.
My guess from your comment is that your idea of "egregiously offensive" would probably not include relatively vague sacriledge. Do I understand you correctly?
In reply to Re^2: Jokes, ad-hominem attacks, and sensitivity
by radiantmatrix
in thread Jokes, ad-hominem attacks, and sensitivity
by radiantmatrix
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |