Why, because someone might haul you into court?(e.g. I understand Rose:DB:Object and DBIx have kind of replaced Class::DBI)Its a good idea to avoid statements like that.
Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class is a good example of why frequency of mention isn't a good gauge of actual popularity, because these days Class::DBI may be mentioned a lot, but the context is usually "don't use this".
Myself I'm skeptical of the concept of ORM software, and if I thought people were tracking mentions of modules I'd have to start using circumloqutions when citing examples ("the CPAN package whose name I will not mention but is spelled C-l-a-s-s::D-B-I").
In reply to Re^2: CPAN - wheat from the chaff
by doom
in thread CPAN - wheat from the chaff
by jfrm
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |