I just visited Nodes to Consider and found several "useless thank-you nodes" listed. I voted to keep all of them as did the majority of voters. All of them actually contained useful information about which solution worked and so I consider them valuable.
Even if they hadn't, I will vote to keep even truely "useless" thank-you nodes. Deleting of nodes should be reserved for truely bad nodes. I really feel that we shouldn't be trying to clean house with Nodes to Consider and it appears that most monks who can (level 6 and above) and do vote there agree with me.
I suggest that submitting such border-line nodes for consideration just ends up sucking up the time of high-level monks who are trying to help with deleting truely bad content.
- tye (but my friends call me "Tye")In reply to (tye)Re2: Increasing the Signal/Noise ratio of PM
by tye
in thread Increasing the Signal/Noise ratio of PM
by mirod
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |