The only way to _really_ test if a number is valid is to feed it to one of the internal functions which lives and breathes IP addresses, such as inet_aton from Socket: 
     use Socket;

     sub IsValidIP
     {
          return $_[0] =~ /^[\d\.]*$/ && inet_aton($_[0]);
     }

[download]
The validation for "numeric-only" prevents any unwanted host name resolutions, which inet_aton will gladly do for you if you give it even half a chance. Of course, if you want those, by all means, but you might want to use Net::DNS if you expect to do this a lot.

It is a common misconception that IP addresses must be exactly 'N.N.N.N' formatted, when in fact, they can be in other formats that are just as useful, such as 'N.N.N' and 'N.N' or just one big, fat, ugly 'N'.

These IP addresses are all equivalent and are all 100% valid: 
      3232235778
      192.11010306
      49320.258
      192.168.258
      12625921.2
      192.43009.2
      49320.1.2
      192.168.1.2

[download]
The numbers in the IP address are only for us computationally impaired humans. Internally they are treated as hex, or in this case, 0xC0A80102, which is the 3232235778 version in decimal. The dots just split up the big hex number into smaller ones which are easier to type in and read. 0xC0A8,0x0102 or 0xC0, 0xA8,0x01,0x02 or whatever strikes your fancy, so long as each compontent is composed of full bytes (2 hex digits per byte).

IP addresses can be represented in these different ways because older implementations allowed you to specify the network as a single number, with the host dangling off the end. There aren't many people who still use them this way, but I have yet to see many programs which reject addresses of this format. Even Windows 'tracert' processes them correctly, as does Netscape, and Internet Explorer. If they're valid, you shouldn't really be rejecting them for old-school style.

In reply to Re: Bing (IP Address Parsing) by tadman
in thread Bing made into a cgi perl script by jamesp

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.