There are a lot of benefits I can see to this, and the approach seems very logical and sane.
... except for the reasons why not to build Perl 6 on the Perl 5 VM which are even more valid in 2006 than they were in 2000, namely that Very Few people know how or want to work on the Perl 5 VM and that the Perl 5 VM is complex and obtuse and sprawling and nearly impenetrable to people who don't already know how to work on it.
(Then again, Simon Cozens and I figured out a way to make continuations work with it and Nicholas and Rafael seemed to agree that it's possible.)
In reply to Re^2: Perl 6... do we need another vm?
by chromatic
in thread Perl 6... do we need another vm?
by jfroebe
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |