This get's tiresome/unmaintainable with 20+ methodsI think the real question you should ask is "how come I have 20+ methods that need to be aliased like this?".
If it's to support legacy, I'd give you a pass. But if you design it this way out of the box, I'd fail you in a code review.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
In reply to Re: what's a proper way to code method synonyms
by merlyn
in thread what's a proper way to code method synonyms
by leocharre
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |