Why? I mean, I can see the argument for not using protected subs at all, but given that it's a requirement, and that the point of "protected" is that the class and its children (thus, inheritence is implied) can call it, what's the issue with that approach?
In reply to Re^3: Private and Protected class methods
by radiantmatrix
in thread Private and Protected class methods
by radiantmatrix
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |