With this I think the question is what is used to constitutes a valid nomination. I think that there should be some minimium monthly activity. There would also need to be some other considerations, but I think that is the main one.
For the perks of getting the award I would say a little plaque in the user information node. To give them recognition for being such a devout perl monk, without changing the system as it stands that much.
In reply to Re: Monk of the Month
by neosamuri
in thread Monk of the Month
by Gavin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |