The prototypes found in C allow functions to behave differently, given different arguments:
int product (int x, int y) {
return x * y;
}
char *product (char *company, int prodID) {
/*
magic to return name of product
related to prodID in the given company
*/
}
Now, in Perl, we can do this ourselves in the function, by checking the contents of
@_, since Perl doesn't differentiate between strings and numbers (or types of numbers) like C does. (But the practice of having a function do totally unrelated things is A Bad Thing, and lends itself to confusion.)
How would you C-ize this Perl function?
sub foo {
die "foo() needs at least one argument" if !@_;
(my($x,$), local($z)) = @_;
$y ||= 10;
$z ||= $x * $y;
# ...
}
Maybe something like
sub foo (
my($x) :req,
my($y) ||= 10,
local($z) ||= ($x * $y)
) {
# ...
}
I find that hideous. I really think I would find any type of variable-based prototyping in Perl pretty ugly.
japhy --
Perl and Regex Hacker
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.