Ok, fine, I guess. What's also missing is that there's no need to implement this with UNIVERSAL:: pollution. This could have just been a "smarter" use and require function named something appropriate and it wouldn't have caused issues for other objects. I have sympathy for features that are best (or perhaps only) implemented by polluting UNIVERSAL:: but this isn't one of them.
⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊
In reply to Re^6: stronger than eval?
by diotalevi
in thread stronger than eval?
by andyford
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |