I followed your link and looked, but all I saw was a pretty diagram consisting of colored boxes with buzzwords in them arranged in a grid, and a little marketing hype. The only other links I saw were to 'screenshots'.
From the phrasing of your OP
After spending the last several years working on projects that ended up needing these kinds of tools, I finally decided to sit down and write them.
this would appear to be a one man development effort, so the text in the boxes:
What's the alternative to a "live" WWW server? A dead WWW-server? An offline WWW server?
What does this mean? Something more that you can give customers an ID?password to logon to one or more of your systems?
Documents? Like HTML files? But that would be a web server.
Maybe .PDF files. Hmmm. Documents live in files. So a 'document server' is just a 'file server'.
Unless this is one of them guys in a classy suit that walks up to you, asks: "Are you Mr. firstname lastname"? And when you confirm your identity, 'serves' you with some 'documents'?
Ah. This is the alternative to a 'live' WWW server--but isn't the difference between them that one is web facing and one is not? If the difference is more than that, doesn't that mean that once I've developed and tested my applications on my WWW-dev server, I have to re-test my applications on my WWW-live server to ensure that they run there also?
All that leads me to these possible descriptions:
Sorry if that sounds cynical, but your 10,000 foot overview tells me so little about your development platform that it is a bit like trying to describe a property after being pointed at an ariel view of it taken from a similar height. "It's that slightly darker grey pixel just there."
In reply to Re^3: Categorizing a Perl Development Platform
by BrowserUk
in thread Categorizing a Perl Development Platform
by jdrago_999
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |