Well, a bit of benchmarking might settle the case - however my guess would be "yes".

I would assume that double-quoted strings need checking for variables - however, if this takes place during the compile stage (and double-quoted strings w/o any vars are optimised out), then benchmarking might not show the difference (since the extra time would be used in the compile stage, rather than the run stage).

Sorry for the ignorant answer, but I was curious to see whether some other monk would confirm or shoot down my assumption.

<update>Heh - looks like my assumption was correct...</update>

Tom Melly, tom@tomandlu.co.uk

In reply to Re: Single Quotes Versus Double Quotes by Melly
in thread Single Quotes Versus Double Quotes by Spidy

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.