I'd argue for leaving warnings turned on in production and making sure they get logged somewhere (not sure what kind of system you're running, but any 'ole logging module ought to work one way or another). For every warning you see in production, you know you'll have to increase your test coverage, because warnings would show up well ahead of the time the code hits production.
You do test your code, don't you?
s**lil*; $*=join'',sort split q**; s;.*;grr; &&s+(.(.)).+$2$1+; $; = qq-$_-;s,.*,ahc,;$,.=chop for split q,,,reverse;print for($,,$;,$*,$/)
In reply to Re: Warnings and Strict in Production/Performance
by chargrill
in thread Warnings and Strict in Production/Performance
by deep submerge
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |