Thanks for that clarification, but you still haven't answered Corion's equally good objection++ above, namely:
The rule is each array contains a sorted (ascending) sequence of non-contiguous, unique integers, but my @a3 = ( 205, 206, 315 ); contains the two contiguous numbers 205 and 206.
Should we be reasoning based on your descripition of the problem, or on your supplied dataset?
In reply to Re^3: Searching parallel arrays.
by Not_a_Number
in thread Searching parallel arrays.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |