I've used xinetd to set up a test nameserver on port 1024. Here's the Net::DNS Perl I'm using to say (falsely) that news.yahoo.com resolves to 10.1.2.3 with a TTL of 1 day:
$res = Net::DNS::Packet->new(); $rr = Net::DNS::RR->new("news.yahoo.com. 86400 A 10.1.2.3"); $res->push(answer => $rr); print $res->data;
According to Net::DNS, here's the prettyprint version of the packet I create:
;; HEADER SECTION ;; id = 26432 ;; qr = 0 opcode = QUERY aa = 0 tc = 0 rd = 1 ;; ra = 0 ad = 0 cd = 0 rcode = NOERROR ;; qdcount = 1 ancount = 1 nscount = 0 arcount = 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION (1 record) ;; . IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION (1 record) news.yahoo.com. 86400 IN A 10.1.2.3 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION (0 records) ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION (0 records)
It's ugly and minimal, but is it a valid DNS answer? Does the question section actually have to contain the question asked or is that optional?
When I try using dig to test, I get this error:
> dig -p 1024 @localhost news.yahoo.com ; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> -p 1024 @localhost news.yahoo.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
My debug logs show that my test nameserver is called thrice (dig tries 3 times by default?) with this packet (prettyprinted below):
;; HEADER SECTION ;; id = 41909 ;; qr = 0 opcode = QUERY aa = 0 tc = 0 rd = 1 ;; ra = 0 ad = 0 cd = 0 rcode = NOERROR ;; qdcount = 1 ancount = 0 nscount = 0 arcount = 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION (1 record) ;; news.yahoo.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION (0 records) ;; AUTHORITY SECTION (0 records) ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION (0 records)
I did notice the packet dig sends has id=41909 and my response has id=26432-- is that a problem?
I'm pretty sure the problem isn't with xinetd and that dig is getting my response packet-- it just doesn't seem to like it for some reason.
20061220 Janitored by Corion: Added formatting, code tags, as per Writeup Formatting Tips
In reply to Minimal DNS answer using Net::DNS by kelly.terry.jones
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |