Actually I just read Martin Fowler's article "Mocks aren't stubs" http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html. It's funny as I think I never used the term "mock" correctly...
I try (failing in this instance :-) to use the more generic term "test double" that Gerard Meszaros came up with rather than mock/stub/dummy/fake/whatever. See http://www.martinfowler.com/bliki/TestDouble.html.
In reply to Re^5: Smallish mock objects
by adrianh
in thread Smallish mock objects
by diotalevi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |