Let me start with a disclaimer, I am the author of Moose, so any opinions here might be a little biased ;)
Specifically, I was wondering how many OO modules are using Moose.
By searching for "Moose" on http://search.cpan.org, then looking at the META.yml and Makefile.PL files, I found the following:
In addition to these modules, we have been using Moose quite a lot at $work. We use it both in the refactoring of older code (I spent a few days once just replacing hand-coded accessors with Moose attributes), and in producing new code. But as I said above, I wrote it (and $work sponsored that effort), so of course we are gonna use it.
I know of several other people who have used Moose successfully at $work as well (passing code reviews and deplying successfully to production). And there seems to be a fair amount of people in the POE and Catalyst communities who are playing around with Moose too.
In reply to Re: Which CPAN modules are most used/depended upon?
by stvn
in thread Which CPAN modules are most used/depended upon?
by dgaramond2
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |