I don't get it, you think google has a bias because it says that PHP is related to Perl, but Perl is not related to PHP? Or that Perl is not related to SQL. Or that Perl doesn't have any tutorials worth searching for.
Or that Perl doesn't have a plan when it comes to physicians? (I hear it's pretty well regarded by biologists, does that count?)
What point were you trying to make?
• another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl
In reply to Re: Google "related" search bias?
by grinder
in thread Google "related" search bias?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |