I thought about it but decided I wasn't sure whether that would work correctly with the later conditional. If it does, great.
⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊
In reply to Re^4: How do I avoid double substitution when replacing many patterns?
by diotalevi
in thread How do I avoid double substitution when replacing many patterns?
by kyle
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |