Something says me it will not be very efficient ...
The particular implementation you mentioned, serializing the file system tree into an XML doc then deserializing it into a XML tree, would indeed be inefficient.
However, XPath can be applied to tree structures (such as a file system) in an efficient manner. It was designed to do just that.
In reply to Re^3: A better, more powerful fileglob?
by ikegami
in thread A better, more powerful fileglob?
by jdporter
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |