Certainly the additional call levels are playing a part, but in more real-world usage of autobox (which wasn't just simple uses of CORE:: subs) I would suspect it would be much less relevant.
Thanks stvn. I whole-heartedly agree with you on this point. I would like to at least optimize the core operations if possible (read easy). I feel it's something that others might also be interested in as far as lowering the entry point/barrier to using autobox speed-wise so we can get on with the more interesting uses.
I'm open to solutions that sub-class and/or hack the Perl portion of autobox and maybe even the XS part if chocolateboy is listening ;)
Of course, if it can be incontrovertibly shown that there is no optimizations to be had, then thanks and nevermind :)
In reply to Re^2: Using CORE:: with autobox
by bennymack
in thread Using CORE:: with autobox
by bennymack
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |