You may be interested in http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html which compares a slew of different revision control systems.
I'm a GUI kinda guy. Having just discovered that Tortoise lets you add detail columns to explorer for things like tags and version numbers I'm in clover. ;)
It's a year since I looked at Monotone, but as I recall it tracks files by their md5 hash - same hash, same file. Much of the interaction with Monotone seemed to involve having to manage files using hashes, but maybe I just didn't grok the interface - I've certinaly forgotten the details.
Of course this a feature that AFAICT all modern SCMs have... [cf. changeset commits]
CVS doesn't, although I guess you could argue that it's not modern.
In reply to Re^3: [OT?] SCM recommendation for small to medium size Perl projects
by GrandFather
in thread [OT?] SCM recommendation for small to medium size Perl projects
by blazar
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |