I agree completely about changing content, with one caveat - changing the *title* of a node can be seen as changing the content, but how many nodes named "Help!!!!" do we really need anyway? :)
I also agree that there is a recent influx of Considered Nodes that are posted because people do not like the question. Please use the power to nominate only for markup problems, bad titles, *obvious* trolls (i.e. Camel Code #2), and things in the wrong section. The fact that someone did not consult the FAQ or do a Super Search is more a failure on the part of the Monastery than on the part of the novice, IMO, as we should be trying harder to guide them there.
In reply to Re: Re: (4) Best way to handle locking...(Amendment 1: No Editing of Content!!)
by turnstep
in thread Best way to handle locking of nodes being edited?
by tye
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |