Or is there some other reason that this wouldn't be a good idea?
I think that it could have backwards compatibility issues that would preclude it from happening in UNIVERSAL::isa(). Which is why ive been harping on about making DOES do the right thing.
In reply to Re^4: I don't understand UNIVERSAL::DOES() (automethodizing)
by demerphq
in thread I don't understand UNIVERSAL::DOES()
by rlb3
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |