I avoid the term "attributes" since we also have attributes in Perl. I think it's unfortunate that some inside-out class generators talk about object "attributes" and then use attributes for methods as well.
And that is an excellent point. I've been considering a slight rewrite, and I think introducing the term "properties" and using it throughout is the straw that pushes me over. I'll be spending some time on that in the next week or so (hopefully).
In reply to Re^5: RFR: Inside-out classes - a Class::InsideOut primer
by radiantmatrix
in thread RFR: Inside-out classes - a Class::InsideOut primer
by radiantmatrix
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |