Rate hash ref
hash 11956/s -- -73%
ref 43773/s 266% --
You are misreading the results. That says using ref is faster by 266%, not slower.
Update: ... or perhaps you have just forgotten how you named your two codes. "hash" and "ref"?! They are both using hashrefs!
The one with the pre-created hashref is the faster one though. Just as common wisdom would have it.
print "Just another Perl ${\(trickster and hacker)},"
The Sidhekin proves Sidhe did it!
In reply to Re: How to access a static hash.
by Sidhekin
in thread How to access a static hash.
by gam3
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |