I can't confirm such a big reduction in size. I tried exactly your code on an image of 704104 bytes, and the output was 704085 bytes. The quality reduction wasn't appreciable either.
FWIW, we use ImageMagick 6.1.5 compiled from source, with the latest libjpeg.
In reply to Re^3: permagick jpg compression
by rhesa
in thread permagick jpg compression
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |