Isn't the point of coverage to change your tests to increase coverage?
Nope. The point is to produce a better product.
Sometimes that'll be by spotting where you need more tests. Sometimes that'll be spotting where you have dead code, or illogical code, and fixing that. Sometimes that'll be leaving well alone.
(spot the bloke on a hobby horse - sorry :-)
In reply to Re^2: When 100% Code Coverage Backfires
by adrianh
in thread When 100% Code Coverage Backfires
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |